nevada (3)

Good News . . .

Just read a Press Release from DS News that should give us all hope. California, Florida and Arizona can't be far behind!This Just Released According to DSNews - - -Bank of America Paces Release of Shadow Inventory in NevadaBank of America expects to release about 6,000 foreclosed properties into the Nevada housing market in 2010, about 500 a month, according to a local Las Vegas newspaper. The pent-up supply is part of that looming shadow inventory - a stock of distressed properties that have yet to hit the market because of banks' voluntary foreclosure moratoriums prior to the administration's Making Home Affordable program, complex modification evaluations, and lengthy short sale negotiations.
Read more…
Ok, I have to give credit to Robin Rowland for tipping me off to this originally. I made a few calls and here is what I've found out.....Bank of America has contracted withREDCto process their Fannie Mae Short Sales using the REOtrans/Equator portal.They also will be working some of Wells Fargo short sales, Metlife short sales and GMAC short sales as well.The idea is to help speed the process up, but hey we all now how that is!There will be an additional 12 page welcome package to fill out and have sellers sign...UGH more paperwork! But hey if it moves a Bank of America Short Sale down to 60 days WHOA HOO!!I wouldn't count on that just yet, but maybe they can prove me wrong. This is a case where I would love to have them prove me wrong! LOL!Oh, and it is supposed to get even better for the seller .....Debt to be considered Paid or Settled with the Deficiency FORGIVEN!!I can't wait to see one of the Short Sale Approval letters to see if it is true.They are only doing Fannie Mae and they have to be assigned from the bank. They have a way to check your loan to see if they can request it go thru them.They are only processing Nevada Short Sales, Arizona Short Sales, California Short Sales and Florida Short Sales that are Fannie Mae.
Read more…
Read the whole article from RISMEDIA @ Op-Ed: 60 Million Mortgages May Have Fatal FlawsInteresting Report....RISMEDIA, September 29, 2009-The latest chapter in the mortgage meltdown is being written in court, as one by one, judges are putting a halt to foreclosures. The latest was a recent Kansas Supreme Court case. In Landmark National Bank v. Kesler, the court held that a nominee company called MERS had no standing to bring a foreclosure action.Nor was Kansas the first. In August 2008, Federal Judge for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada ruled MERS had no standing. "Indeed, the evidence is to the contrary, the Note has been sold, and the named nominee no longer has any interest in the Note."Read more: http://rismedia.com/2009-09-28/op-ed-60-million-mortgages-may-have-fatal-flaws/#ixzz0SVrf1JSYIn each case, the reason stems from a fundamental misstep in the handling of Notes and Trust Deeds that runs contrary to established court policies which require that the real parties identify themselves to the court. Each of these cases involved MERS and, in each case, the courts' rationales were almost identical.First, a little background. Over the last 40 years, mortgage lending has evolved from a bank holding the mortgage to the mortgage being bundled and sold as part of an investment pool, usually in the form of a bond.As a registered security, the Note is a negotiable instrument, like money or a cashier's check, and under securities law that Note must be given to the investor. In this case, mortgage backed securities, (MBS) were bundled together in a pool and shipped to...well, we don't really know.One of the impediments to an MBS is the need to file assignments for the beneficiaries in each county each time the mortgage is resold. And apparently, no one holds them for very long because most have been passed around several times.In order to avoid the logistical nightmare of trying to maintain a public chain of title, the biggest lenders joined MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.MERS was created with the sole intent of evading the recording fees due to the county in which the security is located.But, as there often is with a BIG IDEA, there were also unintended consequences. Only now are they coming to light. Until MERS was challenged in a foreclosure proceeding, no one had taken a look at the law.MERS lost track of the Notes. In some cases, according to my research, they deliberately destroyed them.Every thing was fine until the economy contracted. MERS began foreclosing on delinquent home loans and then one day; someone said "show me the Note."In reviewing the judge's rulings in the above matters, several key points have been determined:• MERS is not the beneficiary of the Notes and has no skin in the game. It did not lend any money, collect any payments or do anything more than track the sale of the securities.• Judicial procedure requires that parties identify themselves and prove their standing.• Splitting the Note and Trust Deed leaves no party with standing to foreclose. The true holder of the Note, the security, paid the lender so the lender is covered. The true holder of the Note was insured by AIG so they are covered. AIG and the banks were bailed out by taxpayers. So, unless the American tax payer can produce a "blue-ink" original Note, no one has standing to foreclose.• Allowing a foreclosure to proceed without the original Note places the homeowner in double jeopardy. If the original Note were to surface, the holder of the Note would be entitled to payment, but from whom? The borrower is still on the hook.MERS currently holds 50 to 60 million loans so this is no small matter. And, just because they have lost repeatedly doesn't mean they will give up. They will keep right on foreclosing in hopes that the homeowner won't fight back and, in most cases, they won't be stopped.[Editor's Note: RISMedia has been in touch with MERS for a response, which will be running in our Wednesday edition of the e-news.]Read more: http://rismedia.com/2009-09-28/op-ed-60-million-mortgages-may-have-fatal-flaws/#ixzz0SVswwhLq
Read more…